Boron-based odor control animal litter

ABSTRACT

This invention relates to an clay-based animal litter to which has been applied a liquid carrier containing a boron-containing compound in an odor-controlling effective amount. The boron-containing compound acts by antimicrobial action, controlling urease, or a combination of these mechanisms when the litter is used by the animal.

This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 07/208,953, filed June17, 1988, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,949,672.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to an animal litter to which has been applied anodor-inhibiting agent which is believed to act by antimicrobial action,acidity, controlling urease, or a combination of these mechanisms tocontrol odor after the litter is used by the animal. The preferred odorcontrol animal litter is a clay-based, particulate substrate to whichhas been applied a liquid carrier containing a boron-containing materialat a critical level of at least 0.06% equivalent boron.

2. Brief Description of the Prior Art

Because of the growing number of domestic animals used as house pets,there is a need for litters so that animals may micturate, void orotherwise eliminate liquid or solid waste indoors in a controlledlocation. However, inevitably, waste build-up leads to malodorproduction.

As one solution to this problem, Eichenauer, U.S. Pat. No. 4,628,863suggests a disposable cat litter box which is easily collapsible and canbe disposed of in a very compact form. However, this approach, intendedfor consumer convenience, does not overcome the problem of malodorproduction.

Kuceski et al, U.S. Pat. No. 3,059,615, Sawyer et al, U.S. Pat. No.3,029,783, Currey, U.S. Pat. No. 4,306,516 and Wortham, U.S. Pat. No.3,892,846, all suggest the use of fairly strong inorganic or organicacids to treat litters in an effort to control ammonia formation inlitters. In each instance, it appears that these acids are essentiallyused to neutralize ammonia to form an odorless salt, e.g., sulfuric acidcombining with ammonia to produce ammonium sulfate.

Still others have sought to decrease odors in litters by improving theabsorption rate of the litter itself. E.g., Fry et al, U.S. Pat. No.3,923,005. Yet another attempt to overcome the problem of odor formationis Colborn et al, U.S. Pat. No. 4,407,231, which, unlike other prior artattempts which merely used a superficial treatment of fragrance, teachespressure-sensitive encapsulated fragrance particles which frangibilizewith the weight of the animal.

Also, two references disclose deodorization of sewage by direct, topicalapplication of, respectively, a trichloroisocyanuric acid (Gould, U.S.Pat. No. 4,054,518) and alkylbenzene sulfonic acid (Ohtsuka, Japan Pat.75-05,538), in both of which cases boric acid is included as a additivein relatively small amounts. Gould apparently uses boric acid as adispersing agent for the trichloroisocyanuric acid. Ohtsuka, on theother hand, uses the alkylbenzene-sulfonic acid for its emulsifying andfoaming properties. Also, Clark et al, U.S. Pat No. 3,352,792, disclosesa deodorant for animal litter containing a dry mixture of magnesiumcarbonate and borax.

Further, Christianson, U.S. Pat. No. 4,263,873, discloses cellulosepellets impregnated with a pheromone to induce animals to micturate orvoid in the litter which has a preferred PH of 4-4.5. Christiansonfurther suggests, but does not exemplify, the use of boric acid or boraxas odor control materials.

However, none of the foregoing art teaches, discloses or suggests theuse of a clay-based litter which has been treated with a ureaseinhibition/odor control agent comprising a liquid carrier containing aboron-based material at a critical equivalent boron level of at least0.06%.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides an odor control animal litter comprisingcomminuted clay particles as an absorbent litter substrate, saidparticles being contacted with a liquid carrier containing anodor-controlling-effective amount of a boron-based material at acritical equivalent boron level of at least 0.06%.

The odor control animal litter can further include adjuncts selectedfrom dyes, further (and different) antimicrobial agents, deodorants,fragrances, pigments, dedusting compounds, and mixtures thereof. It hasfurther been surprisingly found that to maximize active boron content ofthe boron-containing material, that sodium hydroxide solution can act asthe carrier material to deliver preferred quantities of the boron-basedmaterial into the clay litter substrate.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

FIG. 1 is a graphical depiction of the critical level of wt. %equivalent boron plotted against NH₃ inhibition.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention provides an odor control animal litter in whichammonia formation due to decomposition of urea present in animal wastemay be affected by one or more of three mechanisms: (1) pH Control.Since ammonia is a basic material, one would expect that maintaining alow pH will result in the formation of salts of ammonia, which aregenerally odorless. However, in this invention, it has surprisingly beenfound that PH is a relatively unimportant factor in controlling odorformation. (2) Urease Inhibition. Urease is an enzyme which is producedby many bacteria and other microflora. Urease acts as a catalyst tobreak down urea into ammonia via the following chemical pathway ##STR1##Control of urease, via competition, denaturation, or enzyme poisoning,would therefore significantly reduce the formation of ammonia. (3)Bacterial Inhibition. As previously discussed, bacteria and othermicroflora appear to be sources for urease. Thus, reduction of bacteriathrough antimicrobial action of the odor control agents would alsosignificantly control odor formation.

It has been surprisingly discovered that a dramatic reduction in odorformation in used litter can occur if the comminuted clay particles usedas the litter base are first contacted with a liquid carrier containingan odor-controlling-effective amount of a boron-based material at acritical active boron level.

1. Boron-Based Odor Control Agent

Most Preferred amongst the control animal litter additives is boricacid. See, Kirk Othmer, Encyclopedia Chemical Technology, 3rd Ed., Vol.4, pp. 71-77 (1978), incorporated herein by reference. Boric acid hasthe structure H₃ BO₃. Boric acid appears to provide multiple benefits inodor control by: (1) acting as a urease inhibitor, which controls odorsby preventing enzymatic breakdown of urea; (2) apparently havingbacteriostatic properties, which appear to help control odor bycontrolling the growth of bacteria which are responsible for productionof the urease enzymes; and (3) possibly, lowering the pH of the litterthereby neutralizing basic material such as ammonia and amines of animalwaste products; However, as previously cautioned, applicants havesurprisingly found that in this particular invention, the role ofacidity is surprisingly unimportant.

Borax (Na₂ B₄ O₇ ×10H₂ O) is another suitable compound for use in theinvention. Other boron-based compounds potentially suitable for use aredisclosed in Kirk-Othmer, supra, pp. 67-109, said pages beingincorporated herein by reference. In fact, as further discussed below,it appears that the active boron material in the preferred embodiment ofthis invention is actually a mixture of polyborate species, which isformed in situ in a liquid carrier; or it could be separatelymanufactured, dried, and used. Combinations of boric acid and borax, orother boron-based compounds, are also included in the invention.

A reference, J. M. Brenner and R. L. Mulvaney, "Urease Activities inSoils," in: Soil Enzymes (R. G. Burns, Ed.), p. 181 (1978), disclosesthat various compounds can act as inhibitors of urea hydrolysis insoils. This urea hydrolysis occurs because of the presence ofurease-producing microorganisms. However, the reference does notdisclose, teach or suggest that compounds used as urease inhibitors insoils, e.g., by application to fertilizers, would be useful in animallitters. For instance, one reference mentioned, Sor et al, U.S. Pat. No.3,565,599, discloses that urea fertilizers are coated with a combinationof a boron compound and a hydrophobic chemical. It is apparent that thehydrophobic chemical is there to present a barrier to reaction in amoist environment. This can be seen by reviewing Example 8-Table XII,Column 9, Lines 35-52 of the patent.

Another reference, Geissler et al, U.S. Pat. No. 3,523,018 discloses theuse of borax as a urease inhibitor in a melt of urea and borax, whichmust be prilled or pelletized. Finally, Van der Puy et al, U.S. Pat. No.4,462,819 discloses the use of an organo-boron acid compound as a ureaseinhibitor for a fertulizer. Again, none of these references teach,disclose or suggest the use of a liquid carrier containing boric acid asan odor control additive for a clay-based animal litter.

Lastly, Christianson, U.S. Pat. No. 4,263,873, discloses cellulosepellets impregnated with a pheromone to induce animals to micturate orvoid in the litter which has a preferred pH of 4-4.5. Christiansonfurther suggests, but does not exemplify, the use of a boric acid/boraxmixture as odor control materials. Most importantly, Christiansonneither teaches, discloses or suggests that there is a critical level ofat least 0.06% or greater equivalent boron necessary for proper odorcontrol on a clay substrate; that a clay substrate is surprisinglysuperior to cellulose; and that certain liquid barriers are surprisinglyeffective at delivering effective amounts of boron compounds onto theclay substrate.

An odor controlling effective amount is defined as at least about 0.06%equivalent boron, more preferably at least greater than 0.06%. Thepreferred range varies from about 0.06 to about 50%, by weight of thecomposition. It is more specially preferred that 0.1 to 25%, and mostpreferably, about 0.1 to 10%, by weight of the composition be used.Assuming the critical level is attained, those skilled in the art willadjust the compositional levels to ensure effective odor control andcost effectiveness.

In the following discussion, equivalent boron is defined as the amountof atomic boron delivered in wt. %. Equivalent boron is determined bycalculating the amount of atomic boron in a boron-containing compound,and comparing it to another boron containing compound. E.g., assuming 1g boric acid and 1 g borax, equivalent boron is: ##EQU1##

The boron-containing materials are powdered or comminuted solids, andare combined with a liquid carrier such as water or water and a solvent,emulsifier or a hydrotrope, if necessary. It is most preferred to addthe additive via liquid carrier to evenly distribute the additive to thelitter material. As discussed below, in sections 4 and 5, the mostpreferred manner of addition is to use a sodium hydroxide solution as acarrier.

2. Litter materials

A wide variety of materials can be used for litters. For example, porousclays are readily adaptable for use as the absorbent substrates neededfor litters. Their ability to absorb or adsorb moisture makes themexcellent candidates for litters. Most importantly, in the invention,clays demonstrate superior odor control properties when dosed withboron-containing compounds. Suitable litters include Georgia White clay,bentonite, montmorillonite, fossilized plant materials, expandedperlites, zeolites, gypsum and other equivalent materials known to thoseskilled in the art. Paper or other cellulose based materials are notpreferred. The clay particles are comminuted. That is, they arepelletized or formed into particles which have a size varying from 50 to5600 microns, although such particle size does not appear critical tothe practice of the invention. A particularly preferred litter is thelitter containing a microencapsulated fragrance described in Colborn etal, U.S. Pat. No. 4,407,231, incorporated herein by reference.

3. Adjunct materials

Suitable adjuncts can be added to the litters of this invention. Forinstance, there are dyes and pigments such as suitably treated titaniumdioxide; additional and different germicides such as quaternary ammoniumcompounds, and certain 3-isothiazolones (sold under the trademarkKATHON®); chemical deodorants, such as sodium bicarbonate, which differfrom the boron-based compounds of the invention; fragrances (such asthose available from such commercial vendors as International Flavoursand Fragrances, Inc. and Givaudan), which fragrances can additionally beuncoated (e.g., fragrance blends) or encapsulated (as in U.S. Pat. No.4,407,231); dedusting compounds or agents, such as water-solublepolymeric resins, e.g., polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl pyrrolidone,polyacrylic acid, xanthan gum, gum arabic, other natural resins, andmixtures of any of these resins.

4. Processing Materials

It has been further surprisingly found that in order to maximize theamount of equivalent boron which can be applied to the litter substrate,sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in aqueous solution is used as a carriermaterial. It is possible that other alkali metal hydroxides may functionin an equivalent fashion.

In the invention, the range of sodium hydroxide solution can vary from arange of 1.0 to 20.0 wt. %, and it is preferred that it be present incertain weight ratios with respect to boric acid. Preferably, boricacid:NaOH ratio is less than about 10:1, more preferably less than about7:1, and is most preferably around 5:1.

It is not exactly understood why a boric acid/NaOH solution attains suchefficient results, but, without being bound by any particular theory, itappears that boric acid and other sources of equivalent boron, haverather limited solubility in water. Thus, simply dosing dry, finelydivided boric acid is not as effective as using NaOH solution as acarrier. The carrier solution apparently has an added enhancement ofcausing the boric acid to be more adsorbent/absorbent to the clay littersurface. Thus, to a certain extent, NaOH is acting as a dispersing aidfor the boric acid by transforming the boric acid into polyboratespecies. It therefore appears that polyborates are effective odorcontrol agents in and of themselves. This is so whether it is formed insitu by combining boric acid and NaOH in aqueous solution and dosing agiven litter; but also where the polyborate is first formed by a givenreaction, likely in aqueous media, dried into crystals or the like, andused. A further discussion of this system follows in section 5 below.

5. Coated Litter Embodiment

In a preferred embodiment of this invention, the litter is coated viafluid spraying process with numerous materials, including theboron-based odor control actives.

It is most desirable to combine various materials, such as a fragrance,and contact the same to the clay litters of this invention.Microencapsulated fragrances provide a means of aestheticallyfragrancing and masking odors. The microcapsules accomplish this byfracturing when the animal steps on the litter and stresses themicrocapsules until they rupture, releasing the fragrance. Similarly, byhaving the boron-containing odor control compounds of this invention inclose association with the litter particles, one avoids underdosing someparticles, and having excess odor control agent on others, thusunderutilizing the agent.

Thus, in a preferred embodiment, the boron-containing materials of thisinvention are processed in a solution containing alkali metal hydroxide,and then combined with a separate slurry containing other actives, mostdesirably, at least one further additive selected from dyes, pigments,fragrances (most preferably, encapsulated fragrance), further odorcontrol/antimicrobial agents, chemical deodorants, emulsifiers,thickeners and adhesive agents. Xanthan gum is preferred herein, sinceit appears to perform many functions, such as suspending, thickening andadhering.

Further, the boric acid/NaOH solution and the slurry containing theactives need not be kept in separate batches, and in fact, maypreferably be combined so as advantageously to allow either batch orcontinuous processing.

It was found that the somewhat limited solubility of boric acid in watercould be dramatically improved by the use of alkali metal hydroxide,most preferably, sodium hydroxide, in solution. Attempts at using otheremulsifiers/dispersing aids failed, whether acidic, surfactants, or thelike. It was further discovered that heating the NaOH solution mayimprove the solubility of the boric acid. Even more surprising was thediscovery that the high amount of alkalinity in the system did notimpair the odor controlling properties of the boric acid. Literature(e.g., Christianson, U.S. Pat. No. 4,263,873) appeared to teach thatmaintaining low pH was necessary to effect proper odor control. However,the present invention demonstrates that if the critical boron level isattained, pH is a relatively minor consideration in odor control. Again,formation of polyborate may be a key to this improvement in performance.Further explanation of this embodiment of the invention may be found byreference to the Experimental section.

In the Experimental section that follows, three aspects of the inventionwere explored: (1) critical equivalent boron concentration wasdetermined; (2) a comparison was conducted between the prior art and theinvention; and (3) a preferred embodiment, in which the clay litterparticles were coated with both boric acid odor control agent andvarious other actives, was demonstrated.

I. Critical Boron Level Determination

In the following experiments, a critical boron level was determined inthe invention. The experiments showed that at least 0.06% equivalentboron, and most demonstrably at 0.1% equivalent boron, substantiallylittle or no ammonia formation was noted.

The following procedure was used: Georgia-White clay (Oil-DriCorporation of America) was chute-split into samples containing 50 g±2.5clay. Chute-splitting insures uniform particle size of the clay. Thesechute-split samples were placed in 8 oz. jars. Each sample was thendosed with dry powder boric acid, borax, and a 50/50 wt./wt. mixture ofborax/boric acid. The jars were capped, rolled and shaken to insureuniform distribution over the surface of the clay.

To each jar was added 50 mL (53.2 g) of cat urine, with stirring, toensure uniform dosage. After dosing, the jars were uncapped and set outopen in a laboratory hood (room temperature: 70° F. (21° C.)) until anammoniacal odor developed.

Ammonia levels were then determined using a Kitegawa Toxic Gas Detectorloaded with Matheson ammonia detector tubes. First, the jars werecautiously handled so as to prevent disturbing any gases formed in theheadspaces. The jars were capped (the caps were first perforated with asmall aperture to allow access to the ammonia tube) and then the ammoniatubes were inserted. The Kitegawa Detector then drew 100 mL air samplesinto the tubes and ammonia levels were read by viewing color changes inthe tubes and comparing against a scale. In the samples, the levels werereported as the average of 4 replicates, in Table I below. This is alsographically depicted in FIG. 1. The PH of the litters is reported inTable II below.

                  TABLE I                                                         ______________________________________                                        Ammonia data.sup.1                                                                       Source and Ammonia Reading (ppm NH.sub.3)                          Wt. % Equiv. Boron                                                                         Boric Acid                                                                              50/50 Mixture                                                                              Borax                                     ______________________________________                                        0.00         575 ± 38                                                                             575 ± 38  575 ± 38                               0.03         267 ± 25                                                                             292 ± 42  287 ± 15                               0.06          57 ± 15                                                                              78 ± 13  117 ± 15                               0.09          32 ± 17                                                                              37 ± 20   30 ± 6                                0.13          0         0            0                                        0.17          0         0            0                                        ______________________________________                                         .sup.1 Ammonia readings taken 72 hours after dosing.                     

                  TABLE II                                                        ______________________________________                                        pH Data                                                                                         Source and pH Value                                         Wt. % Equiv. Boron                                                                          Boric Acid                                                                              50/50 Mixture                                                                              Borax                                    ______________________________________                                        0.00          6.23      6.23         6.23                                     0.03          6.17      6.50         7.81                                     0.06          6.22      7.48         8.33                                     0.09          6.15      7.70         8.55                                     0.13          6.19      7.95         8.76                                     0.17          6.11      7.98         8.80                                     ______________________________________                                    

II. Comparative Experimentation versus Prior Art

In Christianson, U.S. Pat. No. 4,263,873, it is contended that a boricacid/borax mixture could be added as an odor control additive to acellulose litter/pheromone combination. Applicants compared thecellulose based litter of Christianson versus their preferred clay-basedlitter and found that their invention surprisingly demonstrateddramatically superior odor controlling performance.

In these experiments, the following procedures were followed:

1. Sample Preparation: Since Christianson teaches a paper based litterwhich may be treated with a borax/boric acid mixture, a directcomparison against the inventive clay litter was conducted.Additionally, the Christianson paper litter was directly compared to theclay litters of the invention using a preferred boric acid/NaOHsolution.

a. Cellulose Litter Samples: 100 ml of paper substrate was used toprovide the same volume of litter as in the clay-based samples. Thecellulose samples were Nos. 1,2 and 4. Since the density of paper isabout 0.38 g/mL, 38 g of paper was used. These were loaded in jars. Toobtain the proper pH, as prescribed by Christianson's teachings, 1 g ofNaHSO₄ buffer, added as a solid, was used as to attempt to obtain a pHof 2 (No. 1) and 0.30 g of NaHSO₄ was added to attempt to obtain a pH of5.5 (No. 2). To obtain proper dosage, an eye dropper was used to dose asufficient quantity of a 7% boric acid/borax mixture to obtain a 0.0435g weight equivalent boron content. In the invention, a boric acid/NaOHmixture is a preferred embodiment, so a 30% solution of boric acid/NaOHwas added in a sufficient quantity to obtain a 0.0435 g weightequivalent boron content to No. 4 as a further comparison against theinvention.

b. Clay Samples: In order to provide examples of the invention'steachings, Georgia-White clay was chute-split into 50 g±2 samples toprovide a volume equal to the paper volumes (namely, 100 mL by volume ofclay) and loaded in 8 oz. jars to insure homogeneity and reproducibleresults. As a direct comparison against Christianson, 7% boricacid/borax solution was dropped onto one clay substrate using an eyedropper in a sufficient quantity to obtain a 0.0435 g weight equivalentboron content (No. 3). As an example of the invention, a 30% boric acidsolution with NaOH was similarly added to another sample in a sufficientquantity to obtain a 0.0435 g weight equivalent boron content (No. 5).

2. Sample dosing:

Each sample was dosed with 50 mL of cat urine. Each sample was stirredto ensure homogeneity. The jars were allowed to sit open under a fumehood until an ammoniacal odor developed. At that time, ammonia readingswere taken using the Kitegawa Gas Detector loaded with ammonia tubes,under the protocol described previously. 5 replicates were taken of eachsample and averaged. The following results were obtained:

                  TABLE III                                                       ______________________________________                                        Starting pH of Samples.sup.1                                                         Odor Control   Wt. Equiv.      NaHSO.sub.4                             Example                                                                              Agent          Boron      pH   added                                   ______________________________________                                        1 (Paper)                                                                            Boric Acid/Borax                                                                             0.0435 g.sup.2                                                                           2.65 1.0                                     2 (Paper)                                                                            Boric Acid/Borax                                                                             0.0435 g.sup.2                                                                           5.45 0.3                                     3 (Clay)                                                                             Boric Acid/Borax                                                                             0.0435 g.sup.3                                                                           3.91 --                                      4 (Paper)                                                                            Boric Acid/NaOH                                                                              0.0435 g.sup.2                                                                           8.54 --                                      5 (Clay)                                                                             Boric Acid/NaOH                                                                              0.0435 g.sup.3                                                                           7.91 --                                      ______________________________________                                         .sup.1 pH of the cat urine was 6.70                                           .sup.2 0.115 wt. % equiv. boron                                               .sup.3 0.09 wt. % equiv. boron                                           

                  TABLE IV                                                        ______________________________________                                        Ammonia Readings (ppm).sup.1                                                         Odor Control   Wt. Equiv.                                                                              Time: Time:.sup.2                             Example                                                                              Agent          Boron     68 hrs.                                                                             168 hrs.                                ______________________________________                                        1 (Paper)                                                                            Boric Acid/Borax                                                                             0.0435 g.sup.3                                                                          0      72                                     2 (Paper)                                                                            Boric Acid/Borax                                                                             0.0435 g.sup.3                                                                          7     220                                     3 (Clay)                                                                             Boric Acid/Borax                                                                             0.0435 g.sup.4                                                                          0      0                                      4 (Paper)                                                                            Boric Acid/NaOH                                                                              0.0435 g.sup.3                                                                          64    268                                     5 (Clay)                                                                             Boric Acid/NaOH                                                                              0.0435 g.sup.4                                                                          0      2                                      ______________________________________                                         .sup.1 Hood temperature was 74° F. (23.3° C.)                   .sup.2 LSD (95% confidence level = 30                                         .sup.3 0.115 wt. % equiv. boron                                               .sup.4 0.09 wt. % equiv. boron                                           

The foregoing results in Table IV demonstrate that the clay littersdosed with boron-based odor control compounds of the invention aresuperior to the cellulose based litters of the Christianson patent. Thissuperiority was especially unexpected given that Christianson advocatesa critically low pH (around 4-4.5). One can compare the performances ofEg. 3 (invention) versus Egs. 1 and 2 (Christianson), and of Eg. 5(invention) versus Eg. 4 (Christianson) and see that the invention'sperformance superiority is dramatically unexpected. Moreover, theperformance of applicants' invention shows that pH is apparently not acritical factor, contrary to Christianson's teachings.

III. Coated Litter Particles

1. Boric Acid Processing: As discussed in Sections 4 and 5 above, it wasfound that the limited solubility of boric acid in water could bemarkedly improved by using sodium hydroxide as a processing aid. Inconducting these experiments, it was determined that a discrete amountof NaOH was necessary to put a given quantity of boric acid intosolution.

    ______________________________________                                        a.  14.2% Boric Acid                                                              180 g H.sub.2 O      % boric acid =                                                                            14.2%                                         20 g NaOH           % NaOH =     8.6%                                         33 g H.sub.3 BO.sub.3 (solubilized)                                                               pH =        11.33                                        233 g                                                                     b.  14.67% Boric Acid                                                             170 g H.sub.2 O      % boric acid =                                                                            14.67%                                        4.05 g NaOH         % NaOH =     1.98%                                        30 g H.sub.3 BO.sub.3                                                                             pH =         7.06                                        204.05 g                                                                  c.  20% Boric Acid                                                                160 g H.sub.2        % boric acid =                                                                            19.44%                                        5.79 g NaOH         % NaOH =     2.81%                                        40 g H.sub.3 BO.sub.3                                                                             pH           6.97                                        205.79 g                                                                  d.  34% Boric Acid (reduced scale)                                                 6% NaOH                                                                       34% H.sub.3 BO.sub.3                                                          50% H.sub.2 O                                                                100%                                                                      ______________________________________                                    

In d, the listed materials were mixed with a stir bar in a 600 mlbeaker. As a result of the exothermic reaction, the temperature ofsolution rose to 36° C. Final PH=7.46. This experiment was successful inattaining a clear solution. A further example using only 5% NaOH wasless successful.

e. Maximum Boric Acid Solution: In this example, an attempt was made tocorrelate temperature (heating) and NaOH level to maximize the amount ofboric acid solubilized. The results are disclosed in TABLE V:

                  TABLE V                                                         ______________________________________                                        SOLUTION                                                                      PERCENTAGES                                                                   EX-    % Boric  %       %                                                     AMPLE  Acid     NaOH    H.sub.2 O                                                                          TEMP.  OBSERVATION                               ______________________________________                                        1.     50       5       45   60° C.                                                                        Not Soluble                               2.     30       5       65   "      Soluble                                   3.     33.3     4.8     61.9 "       "                                        4.     35.6     6.7     57.7 "       "                                        5.     38.3     6.4     55.3 "       "                                        6.     40.8     6.1     53.1 "      Did Not                                                                       completely clear                          7.     39.2     5.9     54.9 "      Did Not                                                                       completely clear                          8.     37.7     5.7     65.6 "      Did Not                                                                       completely clear                          9.     37.3     6.7     56.0 "      Clear-Soluble                             10.    38.5     6.6     54.9 "       "                                        ______________________________________                                    

2. Coating Formulation and Process: A process was developed forcombining a boron odor control agent and an encapsulated fragrance (asdescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,407,231), surprisingly, unlike the methodof U.S. Pat. No. 4,407,231, applicants discovered that separatepolymeric suspending and adhesive agents were not required in theirinvention. Instead, the boric acid/NaOH solution appears to combine wellwith a single polymeric agent with both suspending and adhesiveproperties. A most preferred polymeric agent is xanthan gum. Thisembodiment was executed as follows:

1. Xanthan Gum Formula Preparation

Two solutions are prepared:

1) Boric Acid (NaOH solution) and

2) Colorant, encapsulated fragrance in slurry with xanthan gum as athickener/adhesive.

a. Boric Acid

50-75% H₂ O

1-20% NaOH (Beads)

1-40% Boric Acid

b. Dye/Encapsulate Slurry

80-99% H₂ O

0.005-1% Dye

0.05-1% Xanthan Gum

1-20% Encapsulated Fragrance

Solution a is combined with slurry b in a weight ratio of 7:3 to 4:6a:b. This forms a combined slurry. This combined slurry was sprayed on aclay (Georgia-White clay) bed at a level of 2.83% in the final formula.This process is not confined to this order of addition. For example,separate additions of each solution can be effected. Also, theadditives, especially fragrance, dye and thickener could be added in thefirst solution. As previously mentioned, the process could be carriedout in either batchwise or continuous fashion.

While the foregoing formulations depict various embodiments of theinvention, such examples are non-limiting and do not restrict the scopeand content of the claimed invention. The invention is furtherillustrated by reference to the claims which follow hereto.

We claim:
 1. An odor control animal litter comprising a litter materialand an odor control agent which consists essentially of polyborates incontact therewith.
 2. The odor control animal litter of claim 1 whereinsaid polyborates are formed in situ.
 3. The odor control animal litterof claim 2 wherein said litter material is clay.
 4. The odor controlanimal litter of claim 1 wherein the absorbent substrate is a clayselected from Georgia White clay, bentonite, montmorillonite, expandedperlites, zeolites and gypsum.
 5. The odor control animal litter ofclaim 1 further comprising an adjunct selected from dyes, furthergermicides, chemical deodorants, fragrances, pigments, dedustingcompounds, adhesives, thickening agents, suspending agents, and mixturesthereof.